| Location | Port organisation | Published contact address | Address type | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rotterdam | Port of Rotterdam Authority | World Port Center, Wilhelminakade 909, 3072 AP Rotterdam, Netherlands | Port authority visiting address | Published source |
| Houston | Port Houston | 2960 Riverby Road, Houston, Texas 77020, United States | Port organisation contact address | Published source |
| Jurong | Jurong Port Pte Ltd | 37 Jurong Port Road, Singapore 619110 | Port operator homeport contact address | Published source |
| Qingdao | SPG Qingdao Port Group | 11 Ganghua Road, Huangdao, Qingdao, Shandong 266599, China | Port group contact address listed by Port of Hamburg | Published source |
| Antwerp / Belgium | Port of Antwerp-Bruges | Havenhuis, Zaha Hadidplein 1, 2030 Antwerpen, Belgium | Port authority office address | Published source |
| Mersin | Mersin International Port | Cami Şerif Mahallesi, İsmet İnönü Bulvarı No:13A, 33060 Akdeniz, Mersin, Türkiye | Port operator contact address | Published source |
| Singapore — MPA office reference | Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore | 460 Alexandra Road, #18-00 mTower, Singapore 119963 | National maritime authority office; not a Jurong terminal | Singapore Government Directory |
For an actual movement, obtain the precise facility, berth or gate details from the responsible operator. The original user-supplied Mersin address remains identified as a proposed address, separate from MIP’s published contact address.
The six location pages now explain the status of the addresses supplied for review. Antwerp and Rotterdam match administrative office references. Houston uses a legacy reference; the current published contact differs. Singapore’s MPA address is verified but identifies the authority, not a Jurong terminal. The supplied Qingdao reference was not corroborated, and the Mersin street-only reference is incomplete.
Published current references remain separate from any company facility address. All proposed-company-location notices remain in place.
A complete planning brief records the proposed activity, the responsible legal entity, the location and the intended result. It distinguishes information supplied for discussion from facts independently established. This page is part of a labelled concept and does not establish terminal ownership, available services, cargo stock or regulatory approval.
The buyer, seller, terminal operator, carrier and independent service providers may each hold different responsibilities. A review should identify their exact roles and the records needed at each handover. A single generic company description should not be used to assume that all parties, assets and activities have been confirmed.
Maintain a dated record of material information, its source and the person authorised to approve it. If a location, service or supporting document changes, reconcile the affected references before using the information commercially. Website presentation and illustrative images should remain consistent with the evidence, and unanswered questions should not be converted into affirmative company claims.
It organises source-attributed information or a proposed planning topic. It does not independently establish Riga Terminals NV’s registration, company history, operating facilities, inventories or certifications. See the sources page for the status of supplied details.
Use published port contacts only for the purpose indicated by the source. They are distinct from a warehouse, tank farm, berth or cargo-delivery address. The port directory and location pages explain which organisation owns each reference and where the supplied address differs from current published information.
Filter by subject.
Select an image for a larger preview.
8 images
